SIGNAL
Tracking the global AI frontier — labs · research · agents · policy
Frontier Signal
Research

Minimax Quantile Lower Bounds for Interactive Statistical Decision Making with Privacy

Minimax risk and regret are expectation-based criteria and do not capture rare but consequential failures. To address this concern, we develop a $δ$-explicit minimax-quantile theory for interactive statistical decision making (ISDM). We first provide structural relations between minimax quantiles, lower minimax quantiles, and minimax risk. This includes a quantile-to-expectation conversion and an equivalence between strict and lower minimax quantiles outside a countable set of confidence levels.

Minimax Quantile Lower Bounds for Interactive Statistical Decision Making with Privacy
Primary source tldr.takara.ai ↗

Published June 22, 2026 · Category: AI Research

Overview

Minimax risk and regret are expectation-based criteria and do not capture rare but consequential failures. To address this concern, we develop a $δ$-explicit minimax-quantile theory for interactive statistical decision making (ISDM). We first provide structural relations between minimax quantiles, lower minimax quantiles, and minimax risk. This includes a quantile-to-expectation conversion and an equivalence between strict and lower minimax quantiles outside a countable set of confidence levels. We then derive two converse tools for ISDM: a high-probability interactive Fano's method and a high-probability interactive Le Cam's method. Then, we show that mutual-information (MI) privacy can be handled in the same framework by restricting the admissible decision class. For coordinatewise Gaussian privatization, we derive a two-point template that isolates the privacy-induced variance inflation. We instantiate this template for Gaussian mean estimation, and use the same two-point strategy directly for two-armed Gaussian bandits. We then derive a minimax quantile lower bound for the $K$-armed Gaussian bandit problem, showing that the interactive Fano method captures the exploration cost over multiple possible best arms. The resulting lower bounds are explicit in the confidence level $δ$ and in the privacy budget for the private problems. They yield $\log(1/δ)/n$ scaling for squared-error Gaussian mean estimation, $\sqrt{T\log(1/δ)}$ scaling for two-armed bounded-mean Gaussian bandits, and $\sqrt{KT\log(1/δ)}$-type scaling for the $K$-armed bandits, with privacy appearing through a Gaussian variance-inflation factor for the private problems.

Source

Originally published at tldr.takara.ai.

Related Articles

F
Frontier Signal Desk

Frontier Signal tracks the global AI frontier — labs, research, agents, creation tools and real-world practice — straight from primary sources. Tip the desk: editorial@news.tunx.ai

Email the desk →
From our network: explore the AI assistant platform behind this site. Visit tunx.ai →
Note: This story is aggregated and summarized from the primary source linked above; the original publisher retains all rights. Details may evolve after publication — always confirm against the source. Nothing here is professional, legal or investment advice.

Related Stories

More from Research →